19th FIBA Asia Championship For Junior Men Urumqi China

19TH FIBA ASIA CHAMPIONSHIP FOR JUNIOR MEN
URUMQI CHINA

1. GENERAL

1.1. Urumqi, the Capital City of Xinjiang Province is a fast developing centre attracting big influx of tourists all over the world. China has the honour to host this Junior Men Championship in this beautiful city from 1st - 9th September 2006.

1.2. The fine weather of sunny September greeted the participants throughout the season bringing along high quality sweet grapes and melons.

2. PARTICIPATING TEAMS AND DRAW

2.1. At the close of entry, all the 16 spots were taken up. However, due to school going problems, qualified teams from the zones were unable to participate. FIBA ASIA have invited other federations as replacement namely Kyrgyzstan from Middle Asia, Kuwait replacing UAE for Gulf and Singapore for East Asia.

2.2. The Draw to decide the grouping was held at Headquarters FIBA ASIA, MABA House, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. It was conducted by Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock, witnessed by Mr. M.P. Haridas, General Manager, Olympic Council Malaysia (OCM). The representatives from the India and Iran embassies, TV3 and the Press were also present. The results of the Draw is as follows:-

2.2.1

GROUP A
GROUP B
GROUP C
GROUP D
I. R. Iran
Korea
China
Lebanon
India

Syria

Hong Kong China
Thailand

Singapore

Kazakhstan

Japan

Kuwait

Chinese Taipei

Yemen

Kyrgyzstan

Malaysia

3. COMPETITION SYSTEM AND SCHEDULE

3.1. Competition system as stipulated in FIBA Asia governing the competition rules and regulations was applied.

3.2. The competition schedule was produced accordingly and faxed to all parties concerned. Changes had to be effected due to life TV telecast. Details as per the Annex attached.

4. COMPETITION VENUE

4.1. The competition was staged in 2 venues. The approved venues; namely the Xinjiang Sports Centre Stadium and Xinjiang Normal University Stadium in Urumqi. However a difference Stadium Hong Shan was used instead of the later stadium for the competition.

4.2. It needs to be emphasized that the playing floor area of Hong Shan with the dimension of about 32 X 20 Meters was not conducive for a championship of this level. It constrained the movement of the players and pruned to greater injury. There was hardly enough space for the positioning of TV cameras. The seating capacity is about 3300, with the basic facilities. It takes about 30 minutes by bus from athletes hotels.

4.3. The Xinjiang Sports Centre Stadium is located within the beautiful sports Complex. It has all the facilities required for any international event and takes only 5 minutes walk from Tarim Hotel.

4.4. The technical equipments were functional. The backdrop branded “Kim Leng” with the 24 second clocks mounted on top provided good service without any problem.

4.5. One main scoreboard with the timer was installed in the Sport Centre Stadium which has a seating capacity of about 6,500 seats. Minor hiccups caused with the timer tripping occasional. Thus interrupting the smooth running of the game.

5. TEAM MANAGERS MEETING

5.1. The meeting was held at the Sports Centre Stadium Multifunctional Conference Room on 31st August 2006 at 1500 hours. In the absence of Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock, FIBA ASIA Secretary General who was away on urgent work schedule, Mr. Hagop Khajirian chaired the meeting to coordinate the activities of the championship. Matters were conducted as per agenda issued for the meeting.

5.1.1. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE

President : Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock ( Sec. Gen FIBA Asia)
Member ( Host) : Mr. Fei Yixiang ( Asst. Sec. Gen, CBA )
Member ( Coopted) : Mr. Hagop Khajirian ( Deputy Sec. Gen FIBA Asia)
Secretary : Col. Lee Kak Kuan (FIBA Asia)

5.1.2. JURY OF APPEAL

President : Sheikh Saud Bin Ali Al-Thani (President FIBA Asia)
Members : Alternates

Thailand - China / Lebanon / Yemen
India - Syria / Hong Kong China / Korea
C. Taipei - Singapore / Kuwait / Kyrgyzstan
Malaysia - Japan / Kazakhstan / Iran

5.1.3 FIBA Internal Regulations Governing the status of players and basketball nationality was highlighted. The agenda also included the duties of participating teams and penalty for refusing to play, etc.

5.1.4 Confirmed team lists as per the Annex attached.

6 TECHNICAL OFFICIALS AND REFEREES MEETING

6.1 The meeting was held immediately after the Team Managers’ Meeting at the same venue at 1630 hours. Mr. Hagop Khajirian welcomed all the officials present and Col. Lee Kak Kuan the Commissioner continued the meeting. Matters were discussed as per the agenda issued.

6.2 By FIBA ASIA ruling, all teams must have accompanied FIBA Referees. It was well responded and all the teams less Kyrgyzstan did not provided the referee. Total referees for the championship was 20 including 2 neutral referees and referees from the host. The list of the referees and the record of assignment as per the Annex attached.

7 ACCOMMODATION AND FOOD

7.1 Difference hotels were selected to house the officials and 16 participating teams. Minor complaints were received from the team officials. The hosts tried their best to resolve them. Food on buffet style was also catered by the hotels.

7.1.1 Tarim Hotel. All FIBA Officials, Technical officials and referees.

7.1.2 Xinjiang Urumqi City Yazin Building. Japan, Korea, Hong Kong China, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, C. Taipei. and India,

7.1.3 Xinjiang Five Rings Athletes’ Home Hotel. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Kuwait, Iran, Lebanon, China, Yemen and Syria.

8 OPENING CEREMONY

8.1 The official opening was held at Hua Ling Centre on 31st August 2006 at 2000 hours. A grand dinner was staged and the colourful cultural show enhanced the success of the opening. It was a joyous occasion for all the distinguished guests and participating teams.

9 TRANSPORTS

9.1 The importance of transportations need be emphasized when teams and officials were housed in several locations. Bus ferry service was used to convey the teams and other vehicles for the officials. In general, transports was fairly well coordinated and minor problems from the teams were reported which were resolved.

10 THE TOURNAMENT RESULTS

10.1 The competition system catered for 60 matches playing on 2 courts simultaneously to be completed in 9 days with a rest day. An average of 8 matches daily with 4 matches at each court. From the minute of the play-off the event was generally plain sailing with only minor interruptions from the score table and the timer.

10.2 The championship was keenly contested and thrilling to watch the good performance of junior stars of substance. The stadium witnessed very poor spectator capacity, which was not healthy in the promotion of basketball.

10.3 After 8 days of intensive and thrilling competition China and Korea were berthed for the final after some up-sets. Iran the last champion was dethroned at the early encounter and has to settle for the 7 placing. However in the final show-down, China with better average height and talents was certainly hand to beat. Korea noted for sharp shooting and superb team work exerted immersed pressure on China. At half time the score was 48-38 with China leading. In the intense battle for supremacy Korea tried very hard to close the gap. China had better control of the game and withstand the speedy Korean offensive. When the final signal triggered to end the game the score was 99-83 and China regained the Champion it lost to Iran 2 years ago under half filled stadium.

11 CONCLUSION

11.1 The championship presented a good encounter among the youngsters of our Asian members. Keen competition prevailed throughout the season with good display of skill and sportsmanship that thrilled the crowd in the stadium. It was a successful competition and hopefully the Organisers would review the weaknesses recorded for greater success in future championships.

11.2 More efforts on wider publicity should be planned though TV and Press Release to promote basketball to Urumqi population. With the full support from the Sport Ministry, basketball in China would excel to greater height.

11.3 On behalf of FIBA ASIA, I wish to congratulate 19th FIBA ASIA Championship for Junior Men Organising Committee for the successful championship. Finally, to all the sponsors mass media and television for playing the important role in promoting basketball. Also I wish to congratulate China, Korea and Lebanon for having gained their berths to the Junior World Championship in Vancouver Canada Scheduled from 12th – 22nd July 2007.

Thank you “ Peace Through Basketball “

15th Asian Games DOHA

15th Asian Games Basketball
DOHA-QATAR


1 GENERAL

1.1 “The Games of Your Life,” was the theme for the 15th Asian Games Doha. Since Qatar won the bid to host the Asian Games in the year 2000, it has undertaken the challenge in staging the Games in its history.

1.2 The Doha city of desert has been transformed into a Disneyland in hosting this spectacular event. Over 10,500 athletes and team officials from 45 countries and regions competed for the glory in 39 sports and 424 events. Basketball was among the sports. It was held from 23 November to 15 December 2006.

2 PARTICIPATING TEAMS
2.1.1 As far back as September 2005 DAGOC (Doha Asian Games Organizing Committee) had declared through its survey that 12 men and 8 women teams will be participating. However, at the close of entry on 30 October 2006, the event attracted 20 men and 8 women teams

2.2 The overwhelming response registered the participating teams are as follows:
2.2.1 Men: Qatar, China, Lebanon, Korea, Iran, Japan, Chinese Taipei, Bahrain, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Syria, Jordan, Macau China, Hong Kong China, Kuwait, UAE, India, Palestine, Afghanistan and Mongolia.
2.2.2 Women: China, Japan, Lebanon, India, Korea, Thailand, Chinese Taipei and Kazakhstan.

3 THE DRAW
3.1 The draw to decide the groupings was held on the 7th September 2006 at Four Seasons Hotel10:30 hours in the presence of DAGOC officials. The president of FIBA Asia Skeikh Saud Ali AL Thani and Technical Delegate Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock Secretary General FIBA Asia and other officials were invited to the Draw. When none of the FIBA Asia Officials were available to attend the Draw, due to the clash of dates as the 19th FIBA Asia Junior Men Championship was in progress from 1-9 September 2006 in Urumqi China. DAGOC was advised to change the date for the Draw and it was turned down as the Draw must be together with all the teams sports on the same day.


3.2 The Draw was held as scheduled and the results as follows:
3.2.1 Men 1st Round (12 Teams)

Group A Group B
India Uzbekistan
Macau China Palestine
Bahrain Mongolia

Group C Group D
Hong Kong China Kuwait
Syria Kazakhstan
Afghanistan UAE

3.2.2 Men 2nd Round (12 teams)

Group E Group F
Qatar China
Korea Lebanon
Iran Japan
Jordan Chinese Taipei
Winner Group A Winner Group B
Winner Group C Winner Group D
3.3 The results of the Draw appeared in DAGOC Website. At the same time Competition Schedule was prepared for DAGOC’s distribution. Complaint was received from Chinese Taipei that queried on the basis adopted for the Draw. By right Chinese Taipei (men) should be included in the 2nd Round Draw due to the favorable placing gained in 14th Busan Games or 21st FIBA Asia Championship in 2005 Qatar. The complaint was also directed to FIBA for advice. Instead, Kazakhstan which was placed after Chinese Taipei, was seeded in the 2nd Round.
3.4 FIBA Asia identified the problem faced by Chinese Taipei and referred the matter to DAGOC. The basis adopted for the Draw whether from the results of the 14th Busan Asian Games or the Men Championship 2005 in Qatar? A quick examination of both the results in Busan or Qatar revailed difference pictures. The closer basis adopted was Qatar championship, and Chinese Taipei should have been seeded and not Kazakhstan. Also, the Draw was carried out without seeding the top 2 teams from the results, to head Group E and F.
3.5 The query from FIBA Asia received no response as DAGOC preferred to remain silence finding no answer to the basis adopted for the Draw. In the mean time further queries were received from China, Chinese Taipei and Japan. To adopt a fair approach, FIBA Asia amended the competition schedule for 2nd Round. Chinese Taipei was placed instead of Kazakhstan for 2nd Round and vice versa in the 1st Round schedule.

4 TEAMS WITHDRAWAL
4.1.1 Several changes of events took place resulting in the off-balance of the teams in the groupings. FIBA Asia received the information on 23 November that the Indian Men Team had withdrawn from participation due to unforeseen circumstances. Group A you notice have only 2 teams left i.e Macau China and Bahrain. The competition recorded India under forfeit for failing to appear as stated in the FIBA Basketball Rules.
4.2 The 1st Round Competition was a qualifying round for the 2nd Round. Group A with 2 teams left will play only 1 match to decide the winner. Whereas other groups of 3 teams each will play only 2 games. Only the top winner in each group will qualify for the 2nd Round.
4.3 In the Women section Kazakhstan withdrew and Group Y was left with 3 teams. The total participating teams for women was 7. It was emphasized to DAGOC that with 7 teams participation, the normal competition system will be based on one round robin to decide the placing for first to seventh. It was not adopted as DAGOC explained that tickets and programs had been finalized within the limited days of competition. The competition schedule was amended less Kazakhstan in Group Y.
4.4 After the successful competition of 1st Round, India Woman too withdrew from the 2nd Round. Again the Competition Schedule was amended minus India team. The changes of events really caused a lot of inconvenience to DAGOC in term of administration, logistic and financial loss in ticketing. From our record, India also withdrew at the last moment from the basketball event in the 14th Busan Asian Games 2002, which also ended up with 6 teams participating. It was a Round Robin Competition System in Busan.
4.5 The official team lists of the participating teams are hereby attached.

5 COMPETITION VENUE

5.1. Both the 1st and the 2nd round competition was pitched at the sport City indoor basketball stadium . A beautiful architectural design of modern era . It is fully air conditioned with seating capacity of about 2000 spectators . A stadium of this capacity equipped with training and warming up court together with all the administrative and logistic facilities is good enough to accommodate the basketball population of Qatar .
5.2. Backboard Supports
The supports branded Sport System are the products of Italy. The hydra – ribs structure is operating on the hydraulic system. The fault faced was the height of the baskets tipped down about an inch everyday, possibility due to the hydraulic weakness and adjustment takes time. DAGOC can report the defects to the Production Company while under warranty.
5.3. Scoreboards and 24 second clocks .
The pair of scoreboards mounted in the stadium and 24 second clocks are branded Tissot . The big scoreboards have all the datas specified by rules and provided good service as no major fault was reported . Where as the 24 second shot clocks appeared too big and heavy, were mounted of the backboard supports. From the start of the 1st round competition it malfunctioned. There was no timing from the clocks for 7 minutes and no spare clocks were made available. QBF provided the spare from its own source . Shots clocks are vital equipment for the game and spare clocks should be provisioned .
5.4. Besides the scoreboards , a large TV screen provided close circuit TV for the event , and replay the highlights of the games during intervals.

6 TEAM MANAGERS MEETING
6.1. The meeting was held as scheduled on 29 November 2006 at 1430 hours Sport City Indoor Stadium Training Gymnasium. It was chaired by Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock, Technical Delegate, Secretary General FIBA Asia. It proceeded as per the agenda provided.
6.2 Technical Committee
President - Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock（Secretary General Fiba Asia）
Member（Host） - Mr. Mohammad Husain Ibrahim（Qatar）
Member（Coopted） - Mr. Hagop Khajirian（Deputy Secretary General Fiba Asia）
Secretary - Col Lee Kak Kuan ( Technical Director Fiba Asia )
6.3 Jury of Appeal
President - Sheikh Saud Ali Al Thani（President Fiba Asia）
Members - Alternates
（1）I.R. Iran - Korea / Bahrain
( 2）Japan - China / Syria
( 3）C.Taipei - Lebanon / Uzbekistan
( 4）Qatar - Korea / Kazakhstan
6.4 Commissioners
Mr.Lubomir Kotleba (FIBA)
Lt. Kol. Lee Kak Kuan（Malaysia）
Mr. Hashimoto Nobuo（Japan）
Mr. Fouty Nicolas Orgi（Lebanon）
Mr. Zhou Jiang An（China）
Mr. Aneja Naresh Chander（India）
Mr. Jafarian Nosratollah（Iran）
Mr. Manour Seed Al-Ahmari（KSA）
Mr.Mohammad Yousef (Qat)

7 REFEREES MEETING
7.1. The referees meeting was held at 1600 hours after the managers meeting at the same venue to deal with matters as per the agenda provided.
7.2. A total of 24 referees were registered to officiate, including 4 neutral referees. The hosts provided 2 referees to help out the tournament. The list of referees and their assignments for the whole duration of the competition are as attached.

8 ACCOMMODATION AND FOOD
8.1 The teams were accommodated together with all the other athletes in the athletes games village. Whereas the Commissioners and Referees were housed in Technical Officials village. A good apartment complete with the modern facilities. Technical Delegate and high officials of the NOCs in four Season hotel and Movenpit Hotel.
8.2 Meals on buffet arrangement was catered in the Technical Village, and coupons were used. There was no complaint received.

9 TRANSPORTATION
9.1 Air-conditioned buses and cars were use to ferry the officials from the respective accommodation centers to the playing venues. The arrangement was well organized with the instruction on transport system provided.

10 THE COMPETITION AND RESULTS
10.1 The competition presented exciting and high performance basketball. Most of the matches were keenly contested from the preliminary round. Fighting point for point and the victors were only known in the last minute.
10.2 The contest was more intense when it advanced to the semi-finals. The players put it great effort with excellent team works striving for the golden final. Finally, China and C. Taipei gained their berths in the finals for the women group.
10.3 In the final show-down C. Taipei women facing the favorite Chinese, and great pressure the defending Champion with sharp shooting skills and team spirit. Only in the first half and widened the lead. China maintained the gold medal defeating C. Taipei 90-59
10.4 The contest between China and Qatar in the men final was even more dramatic. From the play-off both teams were locked in close battle striving for supremacy and scoring point for point. China proved too strong for Qatar, when the signal sounded to end the match, China defeated Qatar with the score of 59 - 44. It was a sweet reward for China to recapture the gold it lost in the last Busan Asian Games 2002.
10.5 The final standings of the teams are as follows :
10.5.1 Men Results
10.5.1.1 First China
10.5.1.2 Second Qatar
10.5.1.3 Third Iran
10.5.1.4 Fourth Jordan
10.5.1.5 Fifth Japan
10.5.1.6 Sixth C.Taipei
10.5.1.7 Seventh Korea
10.5.1.8 Eighth Lebanon
10.5.1.9 Ninth Kazakhstan
10.5.1.10 Tenth Syria
10.5.1.11 Eleventh Uzbekistan
10.5.1.12 Twelfth Bahrain
10.5.2 Women Results
5.2.1. First China
5.2.2. Second Chinese Taipei
5.2.3. Third Korea
5.2.4. Fourth Japan
5.2.5. Fifth Thailand
5.2.6. Sixth Lebanon

10.6 Details results as per the Annex attached

11 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
11.1 Number of Participating Teams. The total participating teams of 12 men and 8 women set by DAGOC as early as September 2005 was rather fictitious. Competition system and schedule was also based on his number. When there were 20 men and 8 women teams registered to participate DAGOC refused to change the competition format.
11.2 Qualifying Round. To maintain its original number of participating teams and format, DAGOC decided to pool the additional teams to compete in the 1st Round. The 12 teams as indicated in Para 3.2.1 were drawn into 4 groups of A, B, C, D each consisting of 3 teams. This concept was self introduced for the first time in the history of Asian Games.
11.3 The preconceived mind setting to the 12 men and 8 women teams since September 2005 should subject to change in the competition format. Many competition systems are available to consideration. The advice of Fibe Asia or the Qatar Basketball Federation should be sought to adopt the best possible system . Moreover the 12 teams should have been drawn into 2 groups with 6 teams in each group.
11.4 The introduction of the qualifying round was far from ideal. It was totally not cost effective. Macau China in the men group A played only 1 match with Bahrain and had to pact up to go home. Imagine the time and financial implications involved to fly to Doha. Also the Team Referee officiated 1 match and met the same faith to go home.
11.5 Women 2nd Round. As a result of the withdrawal of Kazakhstan (group Y) there were 7 teams left to compete. DAGOC was advised immediately to adopt a Round Robin for the 7 teams. This was not accepted due to limited time, as more games will be played. Then, India also withdrew.
11.6 The implications for 6 teams competition drawn into 2 groups of three teams each which means each team will play 2 games and only two teams will advance to the semi finals . Where as the 3rd placed team in each group will be knocked out ( eliminated ) .
11.7. Again , imagine the team had spent so much time and money to be in Doha, played two games and have to pack up to go home , also the two games were played over a period from 28 Nov to 10 December. This long duration , was rather boring and wasting time . After one game the teams have to wait another 3 days to play the next game ! Complaints from all the participating federations received , against the system of the competition adopted. One Round Robin should have seen the system without doubt.
11.8. Team Withdrawal. The withdrawal of the participating teams at the eleventh hour is a problem to the hosts, as reported under para 4 above. It is recommended that OCA should review the problem in depth especially on team sports. Perhaps the NOCs concerned should be made to compensate the hosts for late withdrawal. The quantum of the penalty rests with the OCA. This problem was reported in the Busan Asian games and no respond was received .

12 CONCLUSION
12.1 The well organized tournament was successfully completed without any major problem. The spectacular performance of high level competition produced thrilling basketball much enjoyed by the excited enthusiasts.
12.2 Qatar scored a first in hosting the Asian Games among the Gulf State. The government and its population will be proud to achieve the tremendous success in hosting. The far sighted forecast of the Qatar sport blue print will certainly enhanced the level of sports to greater heights.
12.3 On behalf on FIBA ASIA I would like to extend my appreciation and gratitude to the hosts for the warm hospitality that greeted the participants Their hard working and loyal commitments had contributed to the successful tournament. Last but not least I wish to congratulate all the medal winners for their fine achievements, in particular China Men and Women for the double Gold.

“Peace Through Basketball”


Thank you.

24th FIBA Asia Championship 2007 Tokushima Japan

http://www.fiba.com/pages/eng/fe/07/fibaAsia/men/index.asp

24TH FIBA ASIA CHAMPIONSHIP 2007
TOKUSHIMA JAPAN

1. GENERAL

1.1. Japan achieved a tremendous success last year in organizing the FIBA World Championship for Men. Once again it has the honour to embark on another premier FIBA Asia Championship for Men from 28th July to 5th August 2007 in Tokushima City.

1.2. Enriched with the experience in hosting the Junior Championship in September 1998, Tokushima acknowledged the responsibility positively in organizing the championship in high notes.

1.3. The Opening Ceremony was staged in Tokushima Prince Hotel in Grand Banquet. Well organized with the cultural display of rhythmic drums and dances. It was a truly delighted performance.

2. PARTICIPATION & DRAW

2.1. Participating was overwhelming through the zone qualifying tournaments. All 16 spots were taken-up and non qualified teams were put on reserves incase of any withdrawal.

2.2. The Draw to decide the groupings was held in Tokushima Grand Palace Hotel at 1530 hours on 6th June 2007. Mr. Hagop Khajirian, Deputy Secretary General, FIBA Asia conducted the draw in the presence of JABBA Officials and mass media. The 16 teams were drawn into 4 groups as given below:

2.2.1. Group A: China, Jordan, Iran & Philippines
2.2.2. Group B: Lebanon, Kuwait, UAE & Japan
2.2.3. Group C: Qatar, India, Kazakhstan & Indonesia
2.2.4. Group D: Korea, Hong Kong, Syria & C. Taipei

3. COMPETITION SYSTEM

3.1. The championship was competed in according to the FIBA Asia Rules and Regulations Governing Competitions. Competition Schedule was prepared with priority given to demands on live television coverage. Final schedule was dispatched to all participating teams and parties concerned.

3.2. Details as per the annex attached.

4. STADIUM AND TECHNICAL EQUIPTMENT

4.1. The championship was held in two stadiums, namely Asty Tokushima Stadium and Tokushima Municipal Gymnasium. Asty Tokushima Stadium designed of modern technology has a seating capacity of about 4500. The lighting was well equipped and effective. There were ample facilities to meet the needs of the championship. It is located about 15 minutes from the athletes’ hotel.

4.2. Tokushima Municipal Gymnasium is located at walking distance from Grand Palace Hotel where the Commissioners and Referees were accommodated. Designed with the basic facilities, has a seating capacity of about 3500.


4.3. The court area has good space for basketball specifications, and the wooden flooring has air trust base to absorb the effect on injury of players. The court lining is well defined and clear under the powerful flood lighting that also catered for TV coverage.

5. TECHNICAL EQUIPTMENT

5.1. The good stadium is also complimented with good equipment. Apart from the quality basketball court, the branded “SENOH” Hyra-rib heavy duty baskets supports were equipped with the 24 second clocks mounted-on them. There were also two electronic scoreboards placed on each side of the court giving faultless service throughout the tournament. The only weakness was that there were not programmed with the players personal fouls display. This information is essential for the coaches, statistics and mass media.

5.2. A large television screen was located behind the VIPs grand stand at the Asty Tokushima Stadium. Providing close circuit captions of the event and instant replay of the actions required. A good show piece that enhanced the success of the championship.

5.3. The score table equipment in particular, was of good design electronic devices. It provided faultless service throughout the championship.

6. ACCOMMODATION AND FOOD

6.1. Three hotels were catered to house the officials and participating teams. They are good hotels, conveniently located for comforts and close to the competition venues as follows:

6.1.1. FIBA-Asia Officials : Hotel Crement Tokushima
1-61, Shimamoto-machi-nishi,
Tokushima-shi, Tokushima-ken, Japan
Tel : 81-88-656-3111 Fax : 81-88-656-3132

6.1.2 Commissioners & Referees : Hotel Grand Palace
1-60, Shimamoto-machi-nishi,
Tokushima-shi, Tokushima-ken, Japan
Tel : 81-88-626-1111 Fax: 81-88-6264565

6.1.3 Team Officials & Players : Tokushima Prince Hotel
3-5-1, Bandai, Tokushima-shi,
Tokushima-ken, Japan
Tel: 81-88-624-1120 Fax : 81-88-624-2375

6.2. Food was provided by the hotels, served on buffet system. The varieties with changes on the menu received no complaint from the Officials and Players.

7. TEAM MANAGERS MEETING

7.1. The meeting was held as scheduled on 27th July 2007 @ 1430 hours. It confirmed the activities of the championship and matters were conducted as per the agenda provided.

7.1.1. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE

(a) President : Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock (Sec-Gen, FIBA Asia)
(b) Member (Host) : Mr. Takeshi Ishikawa (Sec. Gen JABBA)
(c) Member (Co-opted) : Mr. Hagop Khajirian (Deputy. Sec-Gen, FIBA Asia)
(d) Secretary : Col. Lee Kak Kuan (Technical Director, FIBA Asia)

7.1.2 JURY OF APPEAL

(a) President : Sheikh Saud Ali Al-Thani, (President, FIBA Asia)

Members - Alternates

(b) India - C. Taipei / Philippines / Iran
(c) Hong Kong - China / Kazakhstan / Jordan
(d) Japan - UAE / Syria / Qatar
(e) Indonesia - Korea / Lebanon / Kuwait

8. TECHNICAL OFFICIALS AND REFEREES MEETING

8.1. The meeting was held after the Managers’ Meeting at 1600 hours. Matters were conducted as per the agenda provided.

8.2. By FIBA Asia ruling, all teams must have accompanied FIBA referees. It was well responded and all the teams provided the referees. Total referees for the championship was 29 including 2 neutral Referees and referees from Japan. The list of referees and the record of assignment as per annex attached.

8.3. For the first time 3 persons officiating was adopted in view of the high level of competition. To beef up the number of referees required for the championship, additional referees were provided by China (3), Iran (2), Kuwait (2), Korea (2), Kuwait (2) and Japan (5). The system proved good as the game proceeded smoothly without any problem.

9. THE TOURNAMENT RESULTS

9.1 The competition catered for 60 matches to be completed in 9 days. An average of 8 games were played daily with a rest day. From the minute of the play-off, the event was plain-sailing without any un-towards incidence.

9.2. The competition was keenly contested, good performance was displayed at every stage of the competition, especially the semi finals and final. The results were only known in the last minute, with unexpected up-set and China the defending champion was displaced during the preliminary round.

9.3. After 8 days of intensive and thrilling competition Iran and Lebanon were berthed for the final. Iran with good height was certainly hard to beat. However, in the final showdown Lebanon with good shooting and superb team work asserted immense pressure on Iran. Finally, Iran beat Lebanon in a teeth biting contest and captured the crown with the final score 74 - 69 under fully packed stadium.

9.4. The standing results are as given below. Details results as per the annex attached.

9.4.1 The final standing of the competition is as follows:-

9.4.1.1 First - Iran
9.4.1.2 Second - Lebanon
9.4.1.3 Third - Korea
9.4.1.4 Fourth - Kazakhstan
9.4.1.5 Fifth - Jordan
9.4.1.6 Sixth - C. Taipei
9.4.1.7 Seventh - Qatar
9.4.1.8 Eighth - Japan
9.4.1.9 Ninth - Philippines
9.4.1.10 Tenth - China
9.4.1.11 Eleventh - Syria
9.4.1.12 Twelfth - Indonesia
9.4.1.13 Thirteen - Hong Kong
9.4.1.14 Fourteen - Kuwait
9.4.1.15 Fifteen - India
9.4.1.16 Sixteen - UAE

10 OBSERVATIONS

10.1 BELIEVE IT OR NOT! Official Team List of Players is a mandatory piece of document that is required before the championship. FIBA Asia has initiated the instructions for the requirement well ahead of the competition. Even that several teams have not fulfilled the requirement in producing a precise and correct list for the inspection by the Commissioners during the Managers Meeting.

10.2 Family name and given name itself was a problem, date of birth and country of birth too were not correctly filled. Again we faced the similar problem in the completion of The Players Declaration Forms for Doping and the Doping Forms.

10.3 Participating Federations are to pay more attention in doing this exercise in future and to submit the correct lists on the mandate given.

11. STATUS OF PLAYERS. Once again it needs be emphasized that federations are responsible for the eligibility of their players. This will avoid disappointment of any player registered but not authorized to play. Please apply for clearance early from FIBA as per the FIBA Internal Regulations.

12. SOUVENIR MAGAZINE. The production of the magazine is a norm for every FIBA Asia Championship. A colorful edition was produced capturing the essential programs and events. The pictures of officials and players of all the participating teams were uniformly designed. It was a good effort of the LOC.

13. CONCLUSION

13.1 A well organized tournament requires good planning and systematic implementation of the programs and activities apart from finance. Tokushima has opened its gateway towards more international basketball arenas. The Organizing Committee under the supervision Headquarters of JABBA was able to steer the cooperation of every working member for a successful tournament.

13.2 Information Technology (IT) was fully applied to produce the games statistics. The information was displayed immediately as the game progressed, providing all the statistics efficiently. The dedicated FIBA staff provided excellent technical support.

13.3 I wish to thank all the sponsors for their generous contributions, mass media and television for the close support and wide publicity. Your good deeds played the primary role in the promotion of basketball, not forgetting to thank the full cooperation rendered by all the participation teams through out the competition. The presence of FIBA President Mr. Bob Elphinston and Mr. Patrick Baumann Secretary General FIBA graced the occasion.

13.4 Finally, congratulations to Iran Basketball Team for having successfully gained the only spot to Beijing Olympics 2008 and emerged as the champion in this premier event for the first time.


Thank you “Peace Through Basketball”

18th FIBA Asia Champions Cup Tehran Iran

18TH FIBA ASIA CHAMPIONS CUP
12 – 20 May 2007 TEHRAN IRAN

1. GENERAL

1.1. Inspired with the success in organizing the FIBA Asia Young Men Championship in October 2004, once again Iran has the honor to host this major event. The 18th FIBA Asia Champions Cup was held in Tehran, the capital of Iran from 12- 20 May 2007.
1.2. This premier event has captured the great interests of WABA and the Gulf region as indicated from list of participants. This year they have the majority 5 out of 8 spots. Philippines from South East Asia, India and Kazakhstan Middle Asia, took the remaining 3 spots. Bearing in mind Jordan and Kuwait withdrew from participation. Otherwise the score would have been 7 out of the total 10 spots. There was no participant from East Asia.

2. PARTICIPATING TEAMS AND DRAW

2.1. The event and procedure was initiated in February 2007 that, the championship will be held as scheduled. However, due to the late completion of the zones qualifying tournaments, the final entry was only confirmed on 24 April 2007. They were as follows:

2.1.1. Middle Asia : Kazakhstan and India
2.1.2. West Asia : Iran, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon
2.1.3. South East Asia : Philippines
2.1.4. Gulf : Qatar, UAE and Kuwait

2.2. Notice for the draw on 2nd May 2007 at Azadi Sport Complex basketball conference room, Tehran was faxed to all parties concerned. The result of the draw as follows:


2.2.1.
Group A
Group B

Lebanon (Blue Stars)
Qatar (Al Rayyan)
India (Young Cagers)
Kuwait (Al Qadisia)
Jordan (Arena)

Syria (Al Jalaa)
Iran (SABA)
Philippines (San Miguel)
Kazakhstan (Astana Tigers)
Bahrain (Al Muharrak)


2.3. Competition schedule was immediately prepared and faxed / emailed to all the participating teams on 4th May 2007. Then the following events took place.
2.3.1. Jordan (Arena) officially wrote to FIBA Asia on 5th May 2007, stating that due to various reasons, withdrew from participation.
2.3.2. New competition schedule was prepared and sent to all concerned on 6th May 2007. It was too late to replace the vacancy left by Jordan and Group A had 4 teams left.
2.4. During the Team managers Meeting on 11th May 2007 at 1430 hours, it was announced that Kuwait team (Al Qadisia) will not be participating, so Group A was left with only 3 teams (Lebanon, Qatar and India) Whereas Group B with 5 teams was rather off balance.

3. COMPETITON SYSTEM AND SCHEDULE

3.1. Competition System. The system as stipulated in FIBA Asia constitutions governing the competition rules and regulation was applied.
3.2. Competition Schedule. It was amended every time that a team withdrew from competition and sent to all concerned. Details schedule as per annex attached.

4. COMPETITION VENUE

4.1. The competition was pitched at the Azadi Stadium located about 40 minutes drive form Laleh Hotel game village. It is fully air-conditioned and well maintained with seating capacity of 3,000. Equipped with all necessary facilities, including 4 players’ locker rooms, VIPs lounge and other administrative offices.

4.2. The court area is good enough as per the basketball specifications. The floor furnished with wood-base was clearly lined in white paint. Advertising Boards around the perimeter were decorative and created a carnival environment.
4.3. Basket Supports branded Schedule with mounted 24 second clocks were good equipment provided good service, without any problem. The 24 second clock gave some hiccups causing minor interruptions of the game. The equipment should be reviewed for endurance in future championships.
4.4. Electronic Scoreboards mounted on both sides of the court were big and clearly visible to the teams and spectators. They were designed with the require data for information and functioned very well.

5. TEAM MANAGERS MEETING

5.1. For the convenience of the teams, the meeting was held in Laleh Hotel Conference Room on 11th May 2007 at 1430 hours. In the absence of Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock, Secretary General FIBA Asia, Mr. Hagop Khajirian chaired the meeting to coordinate the activities of the championship. Matters were conducted as per agenda issued for the meeting.

5.2. Technical Committee
President : Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock (Sec-Gen, FIBA Asia)
Member (Host) : Mr. Mohammad Reza Mashhoun (Iran)
Member (Coopted) : Mr. Hagop Khajirian (Deputy. Sec-Gen, FIBA Asia)
Secretary : Col. Lee Kak Kuan (Technical Director, FIBA Asia)

5.2.1. Jury Of Appeal
(a) President : Sheikh Saud Ali Al-Thani, (President, FIBA Asia)
Members - Alternates
(b) India - Qatar
(c) Philippines - Syria
(d) Bahrain - Lebanon
(e) Iran - Kazakhstan

5.2.2. Commissioners (FIBA Asia)

(a) Dr. Pratoom Muongmee (Thailand)
(b) Mr. Orabi, Riad (Syria)
5.2.3. Commissioners – Host Country
(a) Mr. Jafarian, Nosratollah
(b) Mr. Kamalian, Safa Ali

5.2.4. FIBA International Regulations Governing the status of players and basketball nationality were highlighted. The agenda also included the duties of participating teams and penalty for refusing to play, etc.
5.2.5. Confirmed team lists as per the annex attached.

6. TECHNICAL OFFICIALS AND REFEREES MEETING

6.1. The meeting was held immediately after the Team Managers Meeting at the same venue at 1600 hours. Mr. Hagop Khajirian chaired the meeting. He welcomed all the referees present and emphasized the important of this championship and then handed over the meeting to Col. Lee Kak Kuan to deal with the technical agenda.
6.2. By ruling, all teams must have accompanied FIBA Referees. It was not fully responded as Qatar and Bahrain did not provide the referees. Total referees for the championship was 11 including 2 neutral referees and referees from the host. The list of the referees and record of the assignment as per annex attached.


7. ACCOMMODATION

7.1. Azadi and Laleh Hotels were chosen for the game village for all participating teams and officials. They are good hotels that provided all the facilities and convenience. The organizers tried its best to resolve on any complaint received.

8. TRANSPORT

8.1. Transport is a vital requirement in a successful organization. Therefore a sound transport system must be carefully planed and executed. Sufficient buses were provided for conveying the teams and cars for officials. There was no complaint received.
8.2. Similarly, ample food was catered and served on buffet system. With the varieties offered with changes in the menu, the participants enjoyed the good food served without complaining.

9. TOURNAMENT

9.1. The competition catered for 22 matches to be completed in 9 days, average of 3 matches were played daily with a rest day. Soon after the inaugural opening ceremony by Sheikh Saud, the President of FIBA Asia, the event play off was plain-sailing. It concluded in success.
9.2. The championship was keenly contested, good performance was displayed at every stage of the competition, especially the semi-finals and final. For most matches, the results were only known in the last minute.
9.3. After 7 days of intensive and thrilling competition, Syria and Iran were berthed for the final. In the final show-down the Iranians with their sharp shooting and superb team work asserted immense pressure on Syria. Both teams were locked in close battle. At half time the score was 41- 39 and Iran leading. The intense struggle for supremacy continued in the second half. When the time expired to end the match, Iran the home team clinched the title as the new champion, under the fully packed stadium. The score was 83 – 75. Detail results as per annex attached. The standing results are as follows:

9.3.1. First - Iran (SABA Battery)
9.3.2. Second - Syria (Al Jalaa)
9.3.3. Third - Qatar (Al Rayyan)
9.3.4. Fourth - Philippines (San Miguel)
9.3.5. Fifth - Lebanon (Blue Stars)
9.3.6. Sixth - Kazakhstan (Astana Tigers)
9.3.7. Seventh- India (Young Cagers)
9.3.8. Eighth - Bahrain (Al Muharraq)

10. OBSERVATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

10.1. Team Withdrawal. The withdrawal of the teams at the eleventh hour presented a dilemma to the organizers. UAE was supposed to participate but withdrew before the draw and was replaced with Bahrain from the Gulf. Then Jordan withdrew after the draw on 5th May, and followed by Kuwait on 10th May, just 2 days before the start of the championship.
10.2. Late withdrawal of participating teams is very unhealthy and should be viewed seriously. Very often it leads to financial losses to the organizers in preparation. This includes booking of the stadium, board and lodging, publicity, sponsors and TV coverage apart from ticketing, etc.
10.3. It is recommended that any team that withdraws late should be responsible to compensate the organization. The quantum of payment depends on the time frame of withdrawal.
10.4. Team referee. By rules all participating teams must have accompanied active FIBA Referees. For this championship Qatar and Bahrain did not have the referees, resulting in the shortage of referees, as Group A consisting of 3 teams only have 2 referees. Thus, the assignment for the referees to officiate the 2 games ( 4 Referees) in Group B was a problem. Neutral referees were used and the presence of Mr. Mohammad Amiri the referee who came without Kuwait team was a blessing in disguise. His service was fully utilized.
10.5. Teams participating in any championship without the accompanied referees is not acceptable. The team that has breached this rule must compensate the organizers the total cost expended to replace the referees from another source. The importance of Referees in this aspect must not be overlooked. It is strongly recommended that this measure must prevail to ensure that the success of the organization is not jeopardized.
10.6. Souvenir Magazine. The requirement may be overlooked. It is a noum in every FIBA Asia Championship that it would be produced for all the participating federations. In a way it is historical and provides a sense of pride to view this valuable souvenir magazine at later stage in life.
10.7. A simple and informative program to captivate the events of the championship must be produced in every FIBA Asia Championship.

11. CONCLUSION

11.1. The championship concluded in success with emphasis that the observations raised need be arrested for future championships. On behalf of FIBA Asia, I wish to congratulate the 18th FIBA Asia Champions Cup Organizing Committee under the leadership of Mr. Mohmoud Mashhoon, President of I.R. Iran Basketball Federation for the successful championship. Heartiest congratulations to Iran (SABA Battery) for having emerged as the New Champion 2007.
11.2. Finally, to all the sponsors, mass media and television for their generous contributions for the love of basketball.


Thank you “ Peace Through Basketball”

22nd FIBA Asia Championship For Women Incheon Korea

22nd FIBA ASA CHAMPIONSHIP FOR WOMEN
INCHEON CITY KOREA


1. GENERAL

1.1 It was indeed an honor of Incheon Korea to host the 22nd FIBA ASIA Championship for Women from 3rd – 10th June 2007. Incheon City will also be hosting the 2014 Asian Games.

1.2 Cool and sunny weather greeted the officials and athletes throughout the season. Strong and well prepared, the teams congregated in Incheon producing their best stars vying for the only spot to the 2008 Beijing Olympic. China has qualified being the host.

1.3 The grand opening ceremony at the eves of the competition was graced with the presence of Incheon Mayer Mr. Ahn Sang Soo in a marvelous banquet held in Ramada Hotel Ballroom on 2 June 2007 at 1900 hours.

2. PARTICIPANTS

2.1 The entry for participation was overwhelming. At the closing deadline all spots were taken up. As participation was limited to 6 teams level Ⅰ and also 6 teams for level Ⅱ, late comers were put on reserves. There was no withdrawal, the teams confirmed participation were as follows:

2.1.1 Level Ⅰ Level Ⅱ
China Uzbekistan
Korea Hong Kong
Japan Singapore
Chinese Taipei India
Thailand Sri Lanka
Malaysia Vietnam

3. COMPETITION SYSTEM & FIXTURE

3.1 The competition was set according to the FIBA ASIA Internal Regulations on Competitions.

3.2 Fixture was prepared accordingly and sent to all the participating federations and parties concerned. Changes were made to accommodate TV coverage.

4. STADIUM AND FACILITIES

4.1 The championship was played at the Samsan World Arena. A well designed stadium of modern technology with a seating capacity of 7,000 people. The lighting was well equipped and the very effective air-condition provided the comforts and reduced the fatigue of staffs that had to work for long hours. There were ample facilities to meet the needs of the championship, you name it and you have it, including computers.

4.2 The numerous advertising boards placed around the arena was decorative creating a carnival atmosphere.

5. TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT

5.1 The good stadium is also complimented with good equipment. Apart from the quality basketball court, the Hyra-rib heavy duty baskets supports were equipped with the 24 second clocks mounted on each support. There were also two electronic scoreboards placed on each side of the court giving faultless service throughout the tournament. The only weakness was, there was no data of the 12 players and coaches personal fouls display. This information is essential for the teams coaches, statistics and the mass medias, apart from the spectators. A 4 dimensions TV screen placed above the center of the arena televised the running events,

5.2 The table officials started off with minor mistakes in scoring and occasional 24 seconds operation. They worked hard showing good improvement and result. More exposures to international competitions should be tested to gain confidence.

6. ACCOMMODATION & FOOD

6.1 Koryo Hotel. All FIBA, FIBA ASIA Commissioners and Referees were accommodated. It was very wise to have the Referees accommodated away from the participating teams. The hotel is excellent with all the modern hi-tech facilities and equipped with computer in every room. It is located about 10 minutes drive to the Stadium.

6.2 Ramada Songho Hotel. Another very good hotel that provides good hotel facilities to the athletes. Located about 40 minutes driving distance to the competition venue.

7. FOOD

7.1 The hotels also catered food for all the officials and players. Abundance food with changing menu were provided for the needs on buffet system. There was no complaint reported.

8. TRANSPORT

8.1 Buses were provisioned for the ferrying of the participating teams from the hotel to the competition venue and return. For others MPV and cars were catered. The system worked smoothly without problem.

9. TEAM MANAGERS MEETING

9.1 The Team Managers meeting scheduled to be held at Ramada Sangho Hotel was moved to the Stadium Conference Room on 2 June 2007 at 14:00 hours. Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock, Secretary General FIBA ASIA chaired the meeting. Matters were discussed as per the agenda provided. It proceeded smoothly.

9.2 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE

President : Dato’ Yeoh Choo Hock (Secretary General, FIBA ASIA)
Member (Host) : Mr. Jaemin Lee (Secretary General, KBA)
Member (Coopted) :Mr. Hagop Khajirian (Deputy Secretary General, FIBA ASIA)
Secretary : Col. Lee Kak Kuan (Technical Director, FIBA ASIA)

9.3 JURY OF APEAL

President : Sheikh Saud Ali Al-Thani, (President, FIBA ASIA)

Members - Alternates
India - Chinese Taipei / Singapore
Malaysia - China / Uzbekistan
Japan - Thailand / Hong Kong
Korea - Sri Lanka / Vietnam

9.4 COMMISSIONERS (FIBA ASIA)

a) Mr. Seah Liang Bing (SIN)
b) Mr. Nomura, Koichi (JPN)
10. TECHNICAL MEETING

10.1 The Technical Officials meeting with the Referees was held immediately after the Managers’ Meeting at 1530. It ironed out the administrative problems that were raised. A total of 17 referees were registered to officiate, inclusive of 2 neutral referees and local referees. All the teams provided their accompanied referees. The list of Technical Commissioners and Referees is attached together with the Referees Assignments.

11. DOPING OVERVIEW

11.1 In conjunction with the championship, Ms. Cendrine Guillon, the Anti Doping Officer FIBA assisted by Dr. Canlas presented the topic to representatives from the participating teams and FIBA ASIA Officials. The importance of doping in basketball was emphasized and its policy was explained. The presentation was truly informative amid active participation. As a reminder FIBA requires the duly completed doping forms 7 weeks before the scheduled competition.

12. THE TOURNAMENT

12.1 There were a total of 36 games to be completed in 9 days. An average of 6 games per day with a rest day. It was plain-sailing from the playoff.

12.2 Most of the games were keenly contested among the teams within its level. More so among the top 4 teams in Level I. Full sporting spirit was displayed to strive for excellence, and the only ticket to the 2008 Olympic.

12.3 After 6 days’ of contest, Korea and China were berthed for the Final. The show down of these two power house of Asia was exiting and thrilling for the spectators as they locked in contest for supremacy. Each team took turn to lead in ding dong battle. Finally when the signal sounded to end the game, Korea defeated the defending champion China with the score of 79 against 73 under fully packed stadium.


12.4 The final standing of the teams in both levels is as followings:

Level Ⅰ Level Ⅱ
Korea India ( Elevated to level I )


China Hong Kong
Japan Uzbekistan
Chinese Taipei Vietnam
Thailand Singapore
Malaysia ( Down graded to Level II ) Sri Lanka

12.5 Detail results are as attached.

13. CONCLUSION

13.1 A well organized tournament requires good planning and systematic implementation of the programs and activities apart from finance. Incheon has opened its gateway towards more international basketball arenas. The Organizing Committee under the supervision Headquarters of KBA was able to steer the cooperation of every working member for a successful tournament.

13.2 For the first time IT was fully applied to produce the games statistics. The information was displayed immediately as the game progressed, providing all the statistics efficiently.

13.3 I wish to thank all the sponsors for their generous contributions, mass media and television for the close support and wide publicity. Your good deeds played the primary role in the promotion of basketball, not forgetting to thank the full cooperation rendered by all the participation teams through out the competition. The presence of FIBA President Mr. Bob Elphinston and the supporting staff graced the occasion.

13.4 Finally, congratulations to KBA for having successful gained the only spot to Beijing Olympics 2008 and emerged as the champion in this premier event.

Thank you “Peace Through Basketball”